Changes between Version 168 and Version 169 of benchmarks

Timestamp:

Jan 29, 2013, 2:12:07 PM (13 years ago)

Author:

goddard

Comment:

--

benchmarks

@@ -3297 +3297 @@
 <b>(7)</b>
 The solid benchmark sometimes reports incorrect high scores, for example 10000, I believe because the texture allocation failed
-and Chimera is merely drawing a yellow outline box instead of drawing the data.  Something else must be going on because a
-size 10000 test would use a 10000 cubed volume which would not fit in memory.  Needs further investigation.
+and Chimera is merely drawing a yellow outline box instead of drawing the data.  This doesn't cause a memory allocation error
+trying to make the large cube of data because only a single plane is allocated, since all are identical.  Currently don't have a way to
+ask if the texture allocation failed.
 </p>
 }}}