On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:26 PM Robert Brinson brinson@... [nmr_sparky] nmr_sparky@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 

Wooghee,

Thank you for the ucsfdata command. It worked, and now the kr command at least functions. However, it is only peak-picking the auto-correlations. How do I get the command to peak-pick the noe crosspeaks? I am referencing the CC-NOESY to the 13C,1H HSQC. Secondly, is there a way to suppress the picking of the auto-correlations?

Thank you again.
Robert

On 10/17/2018 2:28 PM, woonghee791113@... [nmr_sparky] wrote:

 

Dear Robert,

kr does only restricted peak picking. Do you mean nucleus names on the axis panels are incorrect?

You can change by using ucsfdata with -a# option.

For instance,

$ ucsfdata -a1 13C -o new_noesy.ucsf old_noesy.ucsf

$ ucsfdata -a2 13C -o new_noesy2.ucsf new_noesy.ucsf

pipe2ucsf recognizes nucleus name defined in a nmrpipe file, and if it failed, I guess they are written in a little different way than expected.

Best,

Woonghee

---In nmr_sparky@yahoogroups.com , brinson@... wrote :

Greetings,
I am trying to make a peak list for a cc-noesy. I notice that all
dimensions are labeled as 1H when I use the kr command, even though both
indirect dimensions are 13C. I presume the axis mislabeling is the
problem? I checked my nmrPipe file and even modified the axis labeling
in nmrPipe. However, this seems to be lost upon conversion to ucsf
format. I checked another 3D, and the axis was notated correctly. I am
using NMR-FAM 1.413. The dataset was SMILE reconstructed. Any help would
be appreciated.
Best,
Robert