Subject: Re: peak list for CC-noesy
From: woonghee_lee
Date: Oct 17, 2018

Previous: 1416 Next: 1419


Dear Robert,

kr does only restricted peak picking. Do you mean nucleus names on the axis panels are incorrect?
You can change by using ucsfdata with -a# option.
For instance,

$ ucsfdata -a1 13C -o new_noesy.ucsf old_noesy.ucsf
$ ucsfdata -a2 13C -o new_noesy2.ucsf new_noesy.ucsf

pipe2ucsf recognizes nucleus name defined in a nmrpipe file, and if it failed, I guess they are written in a little different way than expected.

Best,
Woonghee


---In nmr_sparky@yahoogroups.com, brinson@... wrote :

Greetings,
I am trying to make a peak list for a cc-noesy. I notice that all
dimensions are labeled as 1H when I use the kr command, even though both
indirect dimensions are 13C. I presume the axis mislabeling is the
problem? I checked my nmrPipe file and even modified the axis labeling
in nmrPipe. However, this seems to be lost upon conversion to ucsf
format. I checked another 3D, and the axis was notated correctly. I am
using NMR-FAM 1.413. The dataset was SMILE reconstructed. Any help would
be appreciated.
Best,
Robert